Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-40105 Document: 00511641042 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40105 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO CEPEDA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-1342-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 11-40105 Document: 00511641042 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40105 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO CEPEDA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-1342-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
Case: 11-40105 Document: 00511641042 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-40105
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
GUILLERMO CEPEDA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:10-CR-1342-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guillermo Cepeda has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Cepeda has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cepeda’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-40105 Document: 00511641042 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-40105
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2