Filed: Dec. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10118 Document: 00511699227 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-10118 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BOBBY DWAINE FAMBRO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-2-2 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 11-10118 Document: 00511699227 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-10118 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BOBBY DWAINE FAMBRO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-2-2 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*..
More
Case: 11-10118 Document: 00511699227 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 19, 2011
No. 11-10118
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BOBBY DWAINE FAMBRO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CR-2-2
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Bobby Dwaine Fambro has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Fambro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10118 Document: 00511699227 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
No. 11-10118
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2