Filed: Dec. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-40448 Document: 00511699170 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-40448 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CARLOS ALVEAR-OLIVE, also known as Eduardo Renteria-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-286-1 Before KING, HAY
Summary: Case: 11-40448 Document: 00511699170 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 19, 2011 No. 11-40448 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CARLOS ALVEAR-OLIVE, also known as Eduardo Renteria-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-286-1 Before KING, HAYN..
More
Case: 11-40448 Document: 00511699170 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 19, 2011
No. 11-40448
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CARLOS ALVEAR-OLIVE, also known as Eduardo Renteria-Maldonado,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-286-1
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alvear-Olive
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Alvear-Olive has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-40448 Document: 00511699170 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2011
No. 11-40448
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2