Filed: Feb. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10521 Document: 00511764117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 22, 2012 No. 11-10521 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CR-59-1 Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 11-10521 Document: 00511764117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 22, 2012 No. 11-10521 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DANIEL CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CR-59-1 Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 11-10521 Document: 00511764117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 22, 2012
No. 11-10521
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DANIEL CONTRERAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:10-CR-59-1
Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Contreras has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Contreras has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10521 Document: 00511764117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/22/2012
No. 11-10521
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2