Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 91-4208 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 91-4208 Visitors: 61
Filed: Aug. 25, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 1 F.3d 287 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 93-6337 , 93-2 USTC P 50,533 KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. No. 91-4208. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1993. Shirley D. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Steven W. Parks, Kenneth L. Greene, Gary R. Allen, Chief, Appellate Sec. Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Abraham N.M. Shashy, Jr., Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for respondent-
More

1 F.3d 287

72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 93-6337, 93-2 USTC P 50,533

KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 91-4208.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 25, 1993.

Shirley D. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Steven W. Parks, Kenneth L. Greene, Gary R. Allen, Chief, Appellate Sec. Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Abraham N.M. Shashy, Jr., Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellant.

Raymond P. Wexler, Todd F. Maynes, Timothy M. Mlsna, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, Ralph P. End, Dallas, TX, for Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.

Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER:

1

On January 17, 1992, we affirmed the tax court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., see Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner, 951 F.2d 76 (5th Cir.1992). On May 24, 1993, the Supreme Court reversed in an opinion at --- U.S. ----, 113 S. Ct. 2006, 124 L. Ed. 2d 71 (1993), and remanded to us for further disposition. In accordance therewith, we now remand the case to the Tax Court for its further proceedings, not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision.

2

SO ORDERED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer