Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sotelo, 07-40396 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40396 Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 12, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 12, 2008 No. 07-40396 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN ALBERTO SOTELO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 5:06-CV-130 No. 5:05-CR-584-1 Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Ju
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        September 12, 2008
                                     No. 07-40396
                                   Summary Calendar                   Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                              Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.

JUAN ALBERTO SOTELO,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                 No. 5:06-CV-130
                                 No. 5:05-CR-584-1


Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Juan Sotelo has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Sotelo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the rec-
ord and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer