Filed: Oct. 22, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-11226 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE VELIZ, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-167-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Veliz, Jr., has
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-11226 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE VELIZ, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-167-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Veliz, Jr., has m..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2008
No. 07-11226
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JORGE VELIZ, JR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CR-167-ALL
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Veliz, Jr., has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Veliz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.