Filed: Oct. 22, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-41288 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CORNELIOUS JOSEPH GREEN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-173-1 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Cornelious Joseph
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-41288 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CORNELIOUS JOSEPH GREEN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-173-1 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Cornelious Joseph ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2008
No. 07-41288
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CORNELIOUS JOSEPH GREEN
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CR-173-1
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Cornelious Joseph Green has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Green has not filed a response. The record is
insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Green’s claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel; such claim(s) generally “cannot be resolved on
direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no
opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.”
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-41288
United States v. Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal
quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record
and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2