Filed: Oct. 22, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-50416 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-660-2 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Rodri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2008 No. 07-50416 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-660-2 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Rodrig..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2008
No. 07-50416
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:06-CR-660-2
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Rodriguez Hernandez
(Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a response.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rodriguez’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Rodriguez’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-50416
motion for the appointment of new counsel and his motion for an order that
current counsel proceed with the appeal are DENIED.
2