Snyder v. USA, 07-60671 (2008)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 07-60671
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 16, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 16, 2008 No. 07-60671 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, III; DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, JR.; PAM SNYDER Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:04-CV-627 Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Snyder family appeals
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 16, 2008 No. 07-60671 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, III; DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, JR.; PAM SNYDER Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:04-CV-627 Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Snyder family appeals ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 16, 2008
No. 07-60671 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, III; DONAL MCLEAN SNYDER, JR.; PAM
SNYDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:04-CV-627
Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Snyder family appeals the district court’s dismissal for want of subject
matter jurisdiction of their lawsuit against the United States. Premising
jurisdiction on the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Snyders brought various tort
claims against the United States based upon its alleged misconduct in disposing
of waste at a Marine Corps base in the early 1970s. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(2006)
We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the pertinent portions of the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-60671
record. The district judge entered a thorough and thoughtful opinion styled as
an Order and Reasons Dismissing Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
Essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
2
Source: CourtListener