Filed: Dec. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-10035 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH DOUGLAS BAKER, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-66-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-10035 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH DOUGLAS BAKER, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-66-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 10, 2008
No. 08-10035
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KENNETH DOUGLAS BAKER, JR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:07-CR-66-ALL
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenneth Douglas
Baker, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Baker has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.