Filed: Dec. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-30436 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DYRON K SAMPSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-30039-1 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CUIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dyron
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-30436 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DYRON K SAMPSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-30039-1 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CUIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dyron ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 10, 2008
No. 08-30436
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
DYRON K SAMPSON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:07-CR-30039-1
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CUIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dyron K. Sampson
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sampson has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.