Filed: Dec. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-40240 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO JAVIER ARAGUZ-BRIONES Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-201-1 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to rep
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-40240 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO JAVIER ARAGUZ-BRIONES Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-201-1 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repr..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 10, 2008
No. 08-40240
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANCISCO JAVIER ARAGUZ-BRIONES
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-201-1
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier
Araguz-Briones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Araguz-Briones has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.