Filed: Dec. 23, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 23, 2008 No. 08-60050 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MIGUEL CRUZ-MARQUINA Petitioner v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A37 567 148 Before WIENER, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Miguel Cruz-Marquina petitions this court for review of an order from th
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 23, 2008 No. 08-60050 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MIGUEL CRUZ-MARQUINA Petitioner v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A37 567 148 Before WIENER, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Miguel Cruz-Marquina petitions this court for review of an order from the..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 23, 2008
No. 08-60050
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
MIGUEL CRUZ-MARQUINA
Petitioner
v.
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A37 567 148
Before WIENER, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Miguel Cruz-Marquina petitions this court for review of an order from the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s
decision granting the respondent’s motion to pretermit Cruz-Marquina’s request
for a waiver of removal pursuant to former INA § 212(c) and ordering Miguel
Cruz-Marquina removed from the United States. Cruz-Marquina contends that
the BIA erred by determining that he was ineligible for relief pursuant to
§ 212(c). Specifically, he avers that he is entitled to § 212(c) relief because his
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-60050
indecency with a child offense is comparable to a crime involving moral
turpitude. Cruz-Marquina’s arguments in support of his petition for review are
foreclosed by our precedent. See Vo v. Gonzales,
482 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007);
Avilez-Granados v. Gonzales,
481 F.3d 869, 871-72 (5th Cir. 2007). Cruz-
Marquina’s petition for review is DENIED.
2