Filed: Jan. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 20, 2009 No. 08-40243 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO RAMIREZ-GUILLEN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-1020 Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ram
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 20, 2009 No. 08-40243 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO RAMIREZ-GUILLEN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-1020 Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Rami..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 20, 2009
No. 08-40243
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARIO RAMIREZ-GUILLEN
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:07-CR-1020
Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ramirez-
Guillen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez-Guillen has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.