Filed: Jan. 15, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 15, 2009 No. 08-60052 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk RICHARD DONALD LAWLER Plaintiff-Appellant v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LUTHER THAXTON, Individually and in his Official Capacity Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:06-CV-579 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circu
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 15, 2009 No. 08-60052 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk RICHARD DONALD LAWLER Plaintiff-Appellant v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LUTHER THAXTON, Individually and in his Official Capacity Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:06-CV-579 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circui..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 15, 2009
No. 08-60052
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
RICHARD DONALD LAWLER
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LUTHER THAXTON,
Individually and in his Official Capacity
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:06-CV-579
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Richard Donald Lawler, Mississippi prisoner # 54271, filed the instant
§ 1983 to seek redress for alleged acts of extortion committed by a prison official.
Lawler failed to properly and timely effect service, and the district court
dismissed his suit for want of prosecution. Lawler appeals that dismissal. He
argues that the dismissal of his suit was improper because his pro se status has
resulted in several barriers to service and that the district court should have
aided him in his attempts to serve the defendants. Lawler has not shown that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-60052
the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his suit. See Systems Signs
Supplies v. United States Dep’t of Justice,
903 F.2d 1011, 1013 (5th Cir. 1990).
Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2