Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-10882 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. COREY ALAN BROCKMAN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-9-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Corey
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-10882 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. COREY ALAN BROCKMAN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-9-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Corey A..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 18, 2009
No. 08-10882
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
COREY ALAN BROCKMAN
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:08-CR-9-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Corey Alan Brockman
presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown,
920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United
States v. Candia,
454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district
court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-10882
state sentence. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED,
and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2