Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-20469 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ADILIO RIVERA, also known as Jose Alirio Rivera, also known as Jose Nochez-Rivera, also known as Jose A Rivera, also known as Jose Rivera Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-4
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-20469 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ADILIO RIVERA, also known as Jose Alirio Rivera, also known as Jose Nochez-Rivera, also known as Jose A Rivera, also known as Jose Rivera Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-42..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 18, 2009
No. 08-20469
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE ADILIO RIVERA, also known as Jose Alirio Rivera, also known as Jose
Nochez-Rivera, also known as Jose A Rivera, also known as Jose Rivera
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-428-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Adilio Rivera
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Lopez-Ortiz,
313 F.3d
225, 229-31 (5th Cir. 2002), which held that an immigration judge’s failure to
inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary waiver of removal at his
removal proceeding did not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair. See
Romero-Rodriguez v. Gonzales,
488 F.3d 672, 677 n.5 (5th Cir. 2007). The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-20469
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2