Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-30406 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDWIN L FRANKLIN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:06-CR-188-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Edwin L. Franklin appeals the sentence imposed fol
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-30406 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDWIN L FRANKLIN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:06-CR-188-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Edwin L. Franklin appeals the sentence imposed foll..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 18, 2009
No. 08-30406
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDWIN L FRANKLIN
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:06-CR-188-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edwin L. Franklin appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea
conviction of making fraudulent claims for Hurricane Katrina-related disaster
relief to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and with making
false representations to FEMA in connection with the fraudulent claims.
Franklin argues that the district court erred by denying him a two-level
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-30406
downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 based on acceptance of responsibility.
The district court denied the downward adjustment due to Franklin’s
repeated use of drugs while awaiting sentencing. The district court’s
determination that Franklin’s drug use was inconsistent with the acceptance of
responsibility is not without foundation. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte,
513
F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
128 S. Ct. 2452 (2008); United States v.
Watkins,
911 F.2d 983, 984-85 (5th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
2