Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Flores-Martinez, 08-40635 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-40635 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-40635 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FELIX FLORES-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-83-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represe
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                FILED
                                                                February 18, 2009
                                No. 08-40635
                             Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIX FLORES-MARTINEZ

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 1:08-CR-83-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Flores-Martinez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Flores-Martinez has not responded. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is




      *
      Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 08-40635

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                   2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer