Filed: Feb. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-50398 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RITO ESPARZA-ORTIZ, also known as Rito Sanchez-Cruz, also known as Rafael Sanchez-Cruz Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-75-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Jud
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-50398 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RITO ESPARZA-ORTIZ, also known as Rito Sanchez-Cruz, also known as Rafael Sanchez-Cruz Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-75-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judg..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 18, 2009
No. 08-50398
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RITO ESPARZA-ORTIZ, also known as Rito Sanchez-Cruz, also known as Rafael
Sanchez-Cruz
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CR-75-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Rito Esparza-Ortiz has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Esparza-Ortiz has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-50398
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
2