Filed: Mar. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 16, 2009 No. 08-10433 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-107-ALL Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernard
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 16, 2009 No. 08-10433 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-107-ALL Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernard J..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 16, 2009
No. 08-10433
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:98-CR-107-ALL
Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernard Joseph
Dolenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dolenz has filed a response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Dolenz’s response discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.