IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                February 18, 2009
                                No. 08-10518
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

COREY DELMAR SMITH

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:07-CR-135-4


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Corey Delmar Smith
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 

(1967). Smith has filed a response. The record is
insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Smith’s claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on
direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no
opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.”



      *
       Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 08-10518

United States v. Cantwell, 

, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal
quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record,
counsel’s brief, and Smith’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                       2