Filed: Mar. 09, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 9, 2009 No. 08-30266 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARTCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, v. WELLONS, INC., Doing Business as Wellons USA, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 1:04-CV-673 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is a suit for br
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 9, 2009 No. 08-30266 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARTCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, v. WELLONS, INC., Doing Business as Wellons USA, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 1:04-CV-673 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is a suit for bre..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 9, 2009 No. 08-30266 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARTCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, v. WELLONS, INC., Doing Business as Wellons USA, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 1:04-CV-673 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is a suit for breach of contract, with each side dissatisfied with some aspect of the judgment. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We also have consulted ap- plicable sources of law, including Louisiana decisions and treatises. The district court correctly decided this case. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
