Filed: Apr. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: -IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2009 No. 08-10492 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE L SILVA Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-188-7 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jose L. Silva
Summary: -IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2009 No. 08-10492 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE L SILVA Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-188-7 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jose L. Silva h..
More
-IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 30, 2009
No. 08-10492
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE L SILVA
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CR-188-7
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jose L. Silva has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Silva has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record
and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.