Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Castillo, 08-40100 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-40100 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40100 c/w No. 08-40106 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JULIAN DE JESUS CASTILLO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-696-1 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Julian De Jesus Castillo appeals t
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                FILED
                                                                 June 16, 2009
                                No. 08-40100
                              c/w No. 08-40106               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                             Conference Calendar                     Clerk



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JULIAN DE JESUS CASTILLO

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 5:02-CR-696-1


Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Julian De Jesus Castillo appeals the revocation of his supervised release.
He contends that the district court unlawfully revoked supervised release based
on hearsay evidence adduced in violation of his limited right to confront adverse
witnesses.    Castillo has served the term of imprisonment imposed upon
revocation, and the district court imposed no further term of supervised release.
Therefore, Castillo has no “concrete and continuing injury,” and there is no case


      *
      Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 08-40100
                               c/w No. 08-40106

or controversy over which this court may exercise jurisdiction under Article III,
§ 2, of the Constitution. Spencer v. Kemna, 
523 U.S. 1
, 7, 14 (1998). His appeal
is DISMISSED as moot.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer