Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Uresti-Martinez, 08-40819 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-40819 Visitors: 85
Filed: Jun. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40819 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ENRIQUE URESTI-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-874-ALL Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 16, 2009
                                     No. 08-40819
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

ENRIQUE URESTI-MARTINEZ

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:07-CR-874-ALL


Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Uresti-
Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Uresti-Martinez has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer