Filed: Jun. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40943 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANTONIO SOTO-PIZZARRO, also known as ANTONIO SOTO- PIZZARRO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-654-ALL Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fed
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40943 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANTONIO SOTO-PIZZARRO, also known as ANTONIO SOTO- PIZZARRO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-654-ALL Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fede..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 16, 2009
No. 08-40943
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE ANTONIO SOTO-PIZZARRO, also known as ANTONIO SOTO-
PIZZARRO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:08-CR-654-ALL
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Soto-
Pizzarro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Soto-Pizzarro has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.