Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gallardo-Gamez, 08-41085 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-41085 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 11, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 11, 2009 No. 08-41085 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ENRIQUE GALLARDO-GAMEZ, also known as Jose Enrique Gomez Garcia, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08-CR-86-ALL Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal P
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           August 11, 2009
                                     No. 08-41085
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ENRIQUE GALLARDO-GAMEZ, also known as Jose Enrique Gomez Garcia,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:08-CR-86-ALL


Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Gallardo-
Gamez (Gallardo) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Gallardo has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer