Filed: Sep. 11, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2009 No. 08-31229 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk JONATHAN JAY PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. ASRC OMEGA NATCHIQ, Corporate Parent Arctic Slope Regional Corp, Corporate Parent ASRC Energy Services, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:08-CV-583 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2009 No. 08-31229 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk JONATHAN JAY PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. ASRC OMEGA NATCHIQ, Corporate Parent Arctic Slope Regional Corp, Corporate Parent ASRC Energy Services, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:08-CV-583 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, C..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 11, 2009 No. 08-31229 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk JONATHAN JAY PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. ASRC OMEGA NATCHIQ, Corporate Parent Arctic Slope Regional Corp, Corporate Parent ASRC Energy Services, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:08-CV-583 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court on November 7, 2008. Mr. Parker has not presented evidence that he is disabled by high blood pressure. One reading that delayed his employment cannot support a finding * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. No. 08-31229 Summary Calendar of disability. And the OSHA or citation relative to a follow-up examination adds nothing. Furthermore, there is no evidence that would support a finding that actual or perceived hypertension was related to his discharge. AFFIRMED. 2
