Filed: Sep. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 23, 2009 No. 08-40954 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NORBELIO CAMPOS-LAGUNAS, also known as Oscar Campos-Laguna, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-486-ALL Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The federal pub
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 23, 2009 No. 08-40954 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NORBELIO CAMPOS-LAGUNAS, also known as Oscar Campos-Laguna, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-486-ALL Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The federal publ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 23, 2009
No. 08-40954
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
NORBELIO CAMPOS-LAGUNAS, also known as Oscar Campos-Laguna,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:08-CR-486-ALL
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The federal public defender appointed to represent Norbelio Campos-
Lagunas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Campos-Lagunas has filed a
response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Campos-
Lagunas’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-40954
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.
2