Filed: Sep. 29, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2009 No. 08-11040 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-113-6 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Leon Johnso
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2009 No. 08-11040 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-113-6 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Leon Johnson..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 29, 2009
No. 08-11040
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANTHONY LEON JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-113-6
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Leon Johnson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson has not filed a timely response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is
GRANTED, counsel’s supplemental motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-11040
unnecessary, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
2