Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-20110 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NICO RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-658-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and ST
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-20110 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NICO RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-658-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STE..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 20, 2009
No. 09-20110
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
NICO RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz
Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:08-CR-658-1
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nico Ruiz-Gonzales
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ruiz-Gonzales has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 09-20110
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
2