Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-40550 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSUE ROGEL-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-20-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Josue Ro
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-40550 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSUE ROGEL-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-20-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Josue Rog..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 20, 2009
No. 09-40550
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSUE ROGEL-TORRES,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:09-CR-20-1
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Josue Rogel-Torres presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Ayala,
542 F.3d
494, 495 (5th Cir. 2008), cert. denied,
129 S. Ct. 1388 (2009), which held that a
violation of T EXAS P ENAL C ODE § 21.11(a) constitutes the offense of sexual abuse
of a minor, justifying a U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) offense level increase. The
appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.