Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Josue Rogel-Torres, 09-40550 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-40550 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-40550 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSUE ROGEL-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-20-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Josue Ro
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                FILED
                                                                 October 20, 2009
                                 No. 09-40550
                              Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

JOSUE ROGEL-TORRES,

                                            Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 2:09-CR-20-1


Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Josue Rogel-Torres presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Ayala, 
542 F.3d 494
, 495 (5th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 
129 S. Ct. 1388
(2009), which held that a
violation of T EXAS P ENAL C ODE § 21.11(a) constitutes the offense of sexual abuse
of a minor, justifying a U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) offense level increase. The
appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.



      *
      Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer