Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lawrence, 08-10712 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-10712 Visitors: 69
Filed: Nov. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 30, 2009 No. 08-10712 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JACKIE LEMAR LAWRENCE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northen District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-79-ALL Before: BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                         November 30, 2009
                                     No. 08-10712
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JACKIE LEMAR LAWRENCE

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northen District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:07-CR-79-ALL


Before: BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jackie Lemar
Lawrence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).                Lawrence has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer