Filed: Nov. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 30, 2009 No. 08-10712 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JACKIE LEMAR LAWRENCE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northen District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-79-ALL Before: BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 30, 2009 No. 08-10712 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JACKIE LEMAR LAWRENCE Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northen District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-79-ALL Before: BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 30, 2009
No. 08-10712
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JACKIE LEMAR LAWRENCE
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northen District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-79-ALL
Before: BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jackie Lemar
Lawrence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lawrence has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.