Filed: Dec. 15, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2009 No. 09-10143 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NICHOLAS CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-119-3 Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nicholas Castillo
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 15, 2009 No. 09-10143 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NICHOLAS CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-119-3 Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nicholas Castillo h..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 15, 2009
No. 09-10143
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
NICHOLAS CASTILLO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:08-CR-119-3
Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Nicholas Castillo has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo has filed a response. Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Castillo’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.