Filed: Jan. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 4, 2010 No. 09-20312 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-GODIN, also known as Evaristo Godin Rodriguez, also known as Evaristo Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-782-1 Before DAVIS
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 4, 2010 No. 09-20312 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-GODIN, also known as Evaristo Godin Rodriguez, also known as Evaristo Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-782-1 Before DAVIS,..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 4, 2010
No. 09-20312
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-GODIN, also known as Evaristo Godin Rodriguez,
also known as Evaristo Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:08-CR-782-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Evaristo Rodriguez-
Godin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez-Godin has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
No. 09-20312
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
2