Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Evaristo Rodriguez-Godin, 09-20312 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-20312 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 4, 2010 No. 09-20312 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-GODIN, also known as Evaristo Godin Rodriguez, also known as Evaristo Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-782-1 Before DAVIS
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           January 4, 2010
                                     No. 09-20312
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-GODIN, also known as Evaristo Godin Rodriguez,
also known as Evaristo Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:08-CR-782-1


Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Evaristo Rodriguez-
Godin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Rodriguez-Godin has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 09-20312

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer