Filed: Mar. 10, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-50519 Document: 00511047222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2010 No. 09-50519 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. OSVALDO RUIZ-RAMIREZ, also known as Uvaldo Ruiz-Ramirez, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-512-1 Before GARZA, CLE
Summary: Case: 09-50519 Document: 00511047222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2010 No. 09-50519 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. OSVALDO RUIZ-RAMIREZ, also known as Uvaldo Ruiz-Ramirez, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-512-1 Before GARZA, CLEM..
More
Case: 09-50519 Document: 00511047222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 10, 2010
No. 09-50519
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
OSVALDO RUIZ-RAMIREZ, also known as Uvaldo Ruiz-Ramirez,
Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:09-CR-512-1
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Osvaldo Ruiz-Ramirez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ruiz-Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.