Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40519 Document: 00511085749 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40519 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH MARTIN APGAR, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-534-1 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 09-40519 Document: 00511085749 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40519 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH MARTIN APGAR, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-534-1 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*..
More
Case: 09-40519 Document: 00511085749 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 20, 2010
No. 09-40519
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KENNETH MARTIN APGAR,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:08-CR-534-1
Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth Martin Apgar has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Apgar has filed a response, in which he makes a request
for appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the record,
counsel’s brief, and Apgar’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 09-40519 Document: 00511085749 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
No. 09-40519
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Apgar’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is
DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
2