Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Raul Ruiz-Almanza, 09-40799 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-40799 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40799 Document: 00511086173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40799 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAUL RUIZ-ALMANZA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-569-1 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T
More
     Case: 09-40799     Document: 00511086173          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2010
                                     No. 09-40799
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL RUIZ-ALMANZA,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:09-CR-569-1


Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Ruiz-Almanza
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ruiz-Almanza has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer