Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40961 Document: 00511086205 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40961 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ROBERTO GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-917-1 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 09-40961 Document: 00511086205 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-40961 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ROBERTO GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-917-1 Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 09-40961 Document: 00511086205 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 20, 2010
No. 09-40961
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LUIS ROBERTO GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:07-CR-917-1
Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Roberto Garcia presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty,
264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge
to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.