Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Eligio Rojas-Valdez, 11-41265 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-41265 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jun. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-41265 Document: 00511872957 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 31, 2012 No. 11-41265 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ELIGIO ROJAS-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-679-1 Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The F
More
     Case: 11-41265     Document: 00511872957         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/31/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           May 31, 2012
                                     No. 11-41265
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELIGIO ROJAS-VALDEZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:11-CR-679-1


Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eligio Rojas-Valdez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rojas-Valdez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-41265   Document: 00511872957   Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/31/2012

                              No. 11-41265

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer