Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gary Woods v. United States, 11-50487 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-50487 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-50487 Document: 00511878248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 6, 2012 No. 11-50487 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GARY WOODS, as Tax Matters Partner of Tesoro Drive Partners, a Texas General Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-cv-00216 Before JONES, Chief Judge
More
     Case: 11-50487     Document: 00511878248         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/06/2012




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                            June 6, 2012

                                       No. 11-50487                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

GARY WOODS, as Tax Matters Partner of Tesoro Drive Partners, a Texas
General Partnership,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

UNITED STATES,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant



                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:05-cv-00216

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WIENER and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        This Court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs and the
record on appeal. Having done so, we are convinced that this issue is well
settled and that the district court should be affirmed. See Bemont Invs., L.L.C.
v. United States, No. 10-41132, --- F.3d ----, 
2012 WL 1435608
 (5th Cir. Apr. 26,
2012); Heasley v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 
902 F.2d 380
 (5th Cir. 1990); Todd
v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 
862 F.2d 540
 (5th Cir. 1988).
                                                                             AFFIRMED.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer