Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Bohannan v. Rick Thaler, Director, 10-10550 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-10550 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 10-10550 Document: 00511904231 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2012 No.10-10550 USDC No. 4:09-CV-662 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ON REMAND
More
     Case: 10-10550     Document: 00511904231         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/28/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 28, 2012
                                   No.10-10550
                                USDC No. 4:09-CV-662                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN,

                                                  Petitioner-Appellant

v.

RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

                                                  Respondent-Appellee


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas


                  ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
                              OF THE UNITED STATES
Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        We vacate the April 23, 2010, judgment of the district court and remand
for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wall v. Kholi, 
131 S. Ct. 1278
 (2011).
        VACATED and REMANDED.



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer