Filed: Jul. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-20111 Document: 00511918939 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 12, 2012 No. 12-20111 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL GIVENTER, Also Known as Michael Blanc, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:10-CR-763-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circ
Summary: Case: 12-20111 Document: 00511918939 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 12, 2012 No. 12-20111 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL GIVENTER, Also Known as Michael Blanc, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:10-CR-763-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circu..
More
Case: 12-20111 Document: 00511918939 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 12, 2012
No. 12-20111
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL GIVENTER, Also Known as Michael Blanc,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
No. 4:10-CR-763-1
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Giventer appeals the denial of his motion to revoke the magistrate
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-20111 Document: 00511918939 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2012
No. 12-20111
judge’s order of detention pending his trial on criminal charges related to bank-
ruptcy proceedings. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3142, 3145. This court remanded this mat-
ter for the limited purpose of obtaining reasons for denial of the motion. The dis-
trict court complied, but Giventer then pleaded guilty of to conspiracy to commit
bankruptcy fraud, so his appeal is moot, see United States v. Ramirez,
145 F.3d
345, 356 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. O’Shaughnessy,
772 F.2d 112, 113 (5th
Cir. 1985), and is therefore DISMISSED.
2