Case: 12-50003     Document: 00511964302         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/21/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 21, 2012
                                     No. 12-50003
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSUE ELISEO CEREN-MARTINEZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-154-1


Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Josue Eliseo Ceren-Martinez (Ceren)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 

 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

 (5th
Cir. 2011). Ceren has not filed a response and has been removed from the
United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 12-50003    Document: 00511964302    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/21/2012

                                No. 12-50003

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see
5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis,

, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).




                                        2