Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40160 Document: 00511964375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 12-40160 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR HUGO RODRIGUEZ-RAGA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-680-1 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: Case: 12-40160 Document: 00511964375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 12-40160 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR HUGO RODRIGUEZ-RAGA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-680-1 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
Case: 12-40160 Document: 00511964375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 21, 2012
No. 12-40160
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
VICTOR HUGO RODRIGUEZ-RAGA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:11-CR-680-1
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Victor Hugo Rodriguez-Raga
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United
States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,
319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of
drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense. The appellant’s motion
for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.