Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Octavio Lopez-Ramos, 12-40146 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-40146 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40146 Document: 00511964336 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 12-40146 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OCTAVIO LOPEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jose Angel Barrera-Valenzuela, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-1385-1 Before SMITH,
More
     Case: 12-40146     Document: 00511964336         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/21/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 21, 2012
                                     No. 12-40146
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OCTAVIO LOPEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jose Angel Barrera-Valenzuela,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:10-CR-1385-1


Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Octavio Lopez-Ramos raises
an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 
586 F.3d 303
, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States
v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 
319 F.3d 695
, 700 (5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of drug
type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer