Filed: Nov. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 10-50624 Document: 00512038164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2012 No. 10-50624 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk FRANCISCO TORRES-LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, RCDC III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texa
Summary: Case: 10-50624 Document: 00512038164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2012 No. 10-50624 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk FRANCISCO TORRES-LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, RCDC III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas..
More
Case: 10-50624 Document: 00512038164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 31, 2012
No. 10-50624
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
FRANCISCO TORRES-LOPEZ,
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, RCDC
III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:10-CV-49
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Francisco Torres-Lopez, former federal prisoner # 18770-179, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition challenging his exclusion from
rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. As Torres-Lopez has been released
from Bureau of Prisons custody, we dismiss his appeal as moot. See Calderon
v. Moore,
513 U.S. 149, 150 (1996).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.